Study Finds Random Drug Testing Doesn’t Deter High School Students’ Substance Use

Random drug testing in schools does not reduce students’ substance use, a national survey of high school students concludes. The study found students who attend schools where they feel treated with respect are less likely to start smoking cigarettes or marijuana.

Students who attend schools where they feel respected, who have already started smoking, escalate their smoking at a slower rate than their peers at schools with less positive atmospheres, the study also found.

Neither random drug testing nor a positive school climate was associated with a reduction in alcohol use, according to researcher Dan Romer, PhD, Director of the Adolescent Communication Institute of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania. He and lead author Dr. Sharon Sznitman, currently at the School of Public Health at Haifa University in Israel, spoke about the findings at the recent American Sociological Association annual meeting.

The researchers interviewed 361 high school students twice, one year apart. They asked them about their use of cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana. If they had not started using these substances at the beginning of the year, the researchers asked whether they had started to do so a year later. If they already had started using any of these substances, the students were asked whether they increased their use.

Dan Romer, PhD
Dan Romer, PhD

Students were asked whether their school had a random drug testing program and what the social climate was in their school. “We measured this by whether students think the rules in their school are fairly administered, whether they feel they have a say in how the rules are developed and if they feel they are treated with respect,” Romer said.

He found students attending school with positive school climates were 15 percent less likely to start smoking cigarettes, and 20 percent less likely to start using marijuana, compared with students at schools without positive climates. Students at schools with positive climates who already smoked had a much smaller increase in the number of cigarettes they smoked, compared with those in schools with less positive climates.

In 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court held that random drug tests of student athletes do not violate the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures. In 2002, the Court decided that random drug tests of students involved in extracurricular activities do not violate the Fourth Amendment.

“That means that kids who aren’t involved in sports or extracurricular activities are the ones who aren’t getting tested, and they tend to be the ones who are more likely to abuse substances,” Romer noted.

He advises parents to ask school administrators how they are fostering a positive climate for students. Several organizations have resources for schools that want to promote such an atmosphere, including the National School Climate Center and Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. “If I were a parent whose child’s school was starting a random drug testing program, I’d question it—there are other ways to help students avoid the use of drugs,” he says.

He is concerned by the finding that even a positive school climate does not seem to deter high school students from drinking. “It’s become normative to drink. Alcohol is easily available and it’s hard to detect.” Romer points to advertising as a major reason why so many teens drink. “One thing we don’t focus on enough is the amount of advertising for beer at sporting events, and alcohol ads on late-night TV and in magazines that teens read,” he said.

His survey showed a big jump in drinking when teens turn 18. “They think they’re adults, and in many ways they are,” Romer observes. “We have to hope that schools with positive climates are at least encouraging their students to be careful in how they use alcohol.”

In 2011, Romer published a study that concluded drug tests in high school had no influence on male students, and only a slight impact on females—but only in some schools. The nationwide study of 943 students found 27 percent said their schools had a drug testing policy. For girls, drug testing only had an effect if they attended schools that had a positive school climate.

20 Responses

Leave your Response
    User Picture


    August 24, 2014 at 11:15 AM

    This is a bunch of garbage. At my son’s high school drug use went from 29 to 2% after regular random drug testing. This article was written by someone who has a financial incentive not to do drug testing in their school. It is expensive but worth it. It may save a kid’s life. Knowledge is power and the first step in preventing abuse

    User Picture


    August 18, 2014 at 9:30 AM

    Random Drug Testing seems like a good and bad idea, Good because it has the potential to stop kids from coming to school intoxicated or high, but if you have an 18 year old who’s old enough to sign up for the military then their gonna feel it’s their right to have a drink. Bad too because children don’t have to come to school intoxicated they could very well do it before school or after and if their parents are working then it become harder to deter.

    User Picture


    August 13, 2014 at 11:34 AM

    I think this is an invasion of their privacy. If you drop the age limit for drinkng, there would be less binge drinking and less death. when you start telling an 18 year old what to do that is when they become opposition. you will have to sit down and talk with them. if they are 18 year old and can fight for their country, they should be able to have a drink.

    User Picture

    widad abdul karim

    February 6, 2014 at 1:01 PM

    students should be educated on the dangers of using drugs

    User Picture

    Mark Zuck

    October 2, 2013 at 1:28 AM

    You are an IDIOT if you think it is ok for a school or anyone that isn’t you for that matter, to randomly drug test your child or children. This is a massive invasion of a person to prove their innocence and be free from unreasonable searches. Something that is directly violates the core of the constitution. You wouldn’t let a officer randomly search your home or car, (or would you) but you would let the draw bodily fluids from your children. “If you have nothing to hide”, is what you say to mindless twits to get them to do what you want them to do. Its not about hiding, its about being a person and having the right to be free from the invasion of your personal and private self. Are you that much of a lame parent that you can’t notice your child’s habits ? Who will be randomly checking the school staff members for drug use ? This is not the same as an employer this is a school of children. We parents as tax payers pay them not the other way around. My children will NOT be participating in any public school programs. To you lame parents so willing to give away your child’s rights and teach them to do so as well, you have been very well programmed and eventually end up as all cattle does.

Leave a Comment

Please leave a comment below to contribute to the discussion. If you have a specific question, please contact a Parent Specialist, who will provide you with one-on-one help.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *