Federal Reserve Says No to Credit Union That Wants to Serve Marijuana Industry

A branch of the Federal Reserve has turned down a request by a credit union that wants to serve the growing marijuana industry in Colorado. In response, the credit union filed a lawsuit against the Federal Reserve, demanding “equal access” to the financial system.

The Fourth Corner Credit Union in Denver applied to the Federal Reserve for a “master account” in November, The New York Times reports. The account would have allowed the credit union to interact with other financial institutions and serve state-licensed marijuana businesses in Colorado.

Andrew Freedman, Colorado’s Director of Marijuana Coordination, said he had hoped the credit union would be granted approval. “We thought it was a good solution to the problem,” he said. “Here was a place willing to take on the risk of banking this underbanked group – and that could do rigorous compliance.”

While recreational marijuana is legal in Colorado, most traditional banks will not work with marijuana businesses because the drug remains illegal under federal law, the article notes.

Banks have shut down marijuana business accounts because they fear being prosecuted for aiding and abetting illegal drug dealers. Marijuana businesses have been forced to deal in cash, making it difficult for them to thrive.

In February 2014, the Obama administration provided banks with federal guidelines for conducting banking transactions with legal marijuana sellers.

    User Picture

    Denise Wymore

    August 5, 2015 at 4:09 PM

    This needs to get fixed. Because these businesses are forced to deal in cash – with no access to FRB and the payment system – employees of these LEGAL businesses are in danger. Nobody should have to die because they cannot get access to basic banking services.

    User Picture

    Jim Recktenwald

    August 4, 2015 at 12:37 PM

    Until every aspect of the marijuana industry is pulled into the open for maximum transparency, we are continuing the process of “hiding away” the evolving structure of the industry. This is not unlike what the industry did to “protect” itself during its “prohibition era”. Unfortunately, now it is the public sector attempting to keep the processes in the dark. Are there two banking systems at the Fed: one legal with traceable transactions and banking fees, and perhaps another with more clandescine transactions and no papertrail for the banking fees? Once the credit union got involved, we all know that the money is in the system. Or am I just a paranoid old hippie?

Leave a Comment

Please leave a comment below to contribute to the discussion. If you have a specific question, please contact a Parent Specialist, who will provide you with one-on-one help.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *