Steve Pasierb’s New York Times Op-Ed: Marijuana Legalization

marijuana legalization

Today’s New York Times published an op-ed penned by our President & CEO, Steve Pasierb, in response to the Times’ July 27th editorial endorsement on legalization of marijuana, “Repeal Prohibition, Again.”  Steve’s response letter, below, can be found both online and in today’s print edition of the paper.

To the Editor:

As your July 27 editorial “Repeal Prohibition, Again” says: “There are legitimate concerns about marijuana on the development of adolescent brains. For that reason, we advocate the prohibition of sales to people under 21.”

Our concern about legalization is its effect on kids. Society may not do much better at enforcing this restriction on sale and marketing of marijuana to kids than we have with alcohol and tobacco. Research shows that use of any of these drugs in adolescence — especially early adolescence — significantly heightens risks of substance use disorders in later life.

We need to provide a much better prevention and treatment infrastructure, which expanded access to marijuana and increasing teenage use will require. That begins with limiting marijuana marketing that kids will be exposed to, and equipping parents with information about the very real health risks of early use.

These are not details to be sorted later, but vital considerations. These are the considerations that matter most to us, and to most parents, including — research shows — those favoring legalization.

President and Chief Executive
Partnership for Drug-Free Kids
New York, July 29, 2014


    User Picture


    September 5, 2014 at 4:00 PM

    Darn right these are vital considerations. In America it is OK to do until it hurts someone. By the time we can prove that the children are being hurt, it will be too late for them.
    Without strict regulations and strong punishment and enforcement the people who market marijuana are not just likely to do anything that will increase sales, they are required to by law. All corporations are required to increase shareholder wealth.

    We cannot let up on this until we have rules that are not just protective of our youth, but overly protective.

    I was a drunk before I left high school because no one cared enough to say no and then to act when i disregarded that no. By the time I acknowledged (not fixed, but acknowledged) it was way, way too late.

Leave a Comment

Please leave a comment below to contribute to the discussion. If you have a specific question, please contact a Parent Specialist, who will provide you with one-on-one help.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *