Local Governments in Southern States Look to Alcohol to Boost Revenues

Local governments in southern states are starting to look to alcohol sales as a way to boost revenues.

In Harrison, Arkansas, stores began selling beer and wine earlier this year, the Associated Press reports. The city hopes it will bring in up to $200,000 annually from alcohol-related sales taxes and fees—which represents about 1 percent of the budget.

The city of 13,000 residents, in the Ozark Mountains, finds tourists are staying longer ever since voters approved alcohol sales in the city last year. “We’re a pretty poor county, and we just can’t afford to say we don’t want anyone’s business,” Gerald Ragland, Harrison’s Finance Director, told the AP.

Until last year, Boone County, where Harrison is located, was “dry,” as were many municipalities across the South. Critics of the move to allow alcohol sales in Harrison said dry laws help prevent criminal activity and underage drinking. Supporters of lifting the alcohol sales ban countered that the law promoted increased drinking, because people would buy alcohol in bulk when they had to drive further to purchase it.

Other towns across the South are easing alcohol sales restrictions, including laws that prohibit sales on Sundays. Many dry laws have been eliminated in Texas since 2003, when the state legislature changed state law to make it less complicated to hold “wet/dry” elections, according to the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States.

    User Picture


    September 30, 2011 at 5:06 PM

    I guess its the alcohol industry/advocates that continue to promote the idea that governments/municipalities can profit by the sale of alcohol. The state of California takes in $17million in alcohol tax revenues. It spends $38BILLION on alcohol abuse. Who do you think subsidizes the obscene profits made by an industry? Local governments and taxpayers. The city of Fullerton did a cost analysis of how much they took in from alcohol sales tax revenues, $560,00 and how much those licenses were actually costing the city… $1.5 MILLION $1.5 million annually in police, fire and maintenance costs. Such a deal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *